.
.
.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: IVPHC: H5N1 - Antibodies Research Focus

Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:13:08 -0800
From: "Stephen M. Apatow" <s.m.apatow@pathobiologics.org>
To: ivphc.wg@pathobiologics.org



24 February 2009

IDIN: Pathobiologics International
Subject: Biodefense Threat Analysis & Communication Center

Dear Colleagues:

Researchers have discovered human antibodies that neutralize not only H5N1 bird flu but other strains of influenza as well and say they hope to develop them into lifesaving treatments. The antibodies -- immune system proteins that attach to invaders such as viruses -- also might be used to protect front-line workers and others at high risk in case a pandemic of flu broke out, the researchers said. -- Antibodies protect against bird flu and more: Reuters, 22 February 2009.


As noted below, populations across the globe have most probably developed a natural immune response to the H5N1 bird flu pathogens that have been circulating for 5-6 years.  The political factors that have restricted access to molecular diagnostics technologies, so these epidemiological variables could be understood, now enter into current discussions associated with subclinical infection of Ebola Reston (Manila to slaughter 6000 pigs to stop Ebola spread, 23 February 2009).

Once again, we are reminded of the importance of clinic level access to hand held molecular diagnostics technologies, pcr/microarray and bioinformatics analysis to assist with surveillance, containment and control of emerging infectious disease challenges.

The Pandemic Model

H5N1 has spread across the globe as a containable animal health pandemic, with human exposure proportional to direct environmental contact of populations (including 3.5 billion + in impoverished populations with no public health infrastructure). Since we did not view large numbers of human deaths following exposure, the extreme distortion of statistical information associated with human infection and geographical impact appears to be a direct result of restricted access to molecular diagnostic technologies.

On the the most striking variables associated with pandemic risk, is denial of global spread of human transmissible H5N1 strains with mild clinical manifestation.  The global public health discussion "PRO/AH> Avian influenza, human (140): atypical infections" (ProMED: 20060905.2522: 05-SEP-2006) presents variables excluded in the current H5N1 pandemic discussion:
  • Atypical H5N1 infections (encephalitis, diarrheal, gastrointestinal illness) were excluded from the potential clinical spectrum of challenge.
  • While much has been made of the fulminant cases of presumed viral pneumonia in 1918, Dr. Brundage's research indicates that the majority of pneumonia cases, even in 1918, were either secondary bacterial pneumonias following an influenza infection or mixed viral and bacterial pneumonias. In the pre-antibiotic era, these cases of bacterial pneumonia carried a very high mortality rate; however, with appropriate antibiotic therapy, many such patients may be saved.
Again, I emphasize that the key variable associated with mortality during the 1918 pandemic, was access to antibiotics crucial to the containment of challenges associated with co-infection compromising the overall immune response.  Co-infection must become a prioritized focus point, since multiple antibiotic sensitive variables could mean an immediate capacity to boost the natural immune response and ability to handle a viral challenge.

It is vital that immediate efforts are set forward in every United Nations member country to conduct population surveillance for the existence of antibodies to H5N1 strains and genomic variants considered high consequence.  This information is vital, since population exposure to mild atypical strains, would encompass an increased immune capacity to handle exposure of potential pandemic strains (that without such information could cause a panic).  This is especially important in the light of false guidance that widespread population exposure has not occurred in conjunction with the H5N1 global animal health pandemic during the last 5-6 years.


Supporting HRI Advocacy work

Humanitarian Resource Institute and Pathobiologics International provides peer reviewed access to educational materials for policy development, public health and emergency response for leaders in 192 member states of the United Nations.  As with ProMED, physicians, veterinarians and public health professionals across the globe, have the capacity to open discussion regarding high consequence emerging infectious disease challenges of international public health significance.

There are several ways, you can support this continued work:
  • 1. Help us promote HRI Continuing Education courses in Foreign Animal Disease, Zoonotic Disease and International Health Regulations.  We are open to expansion of available courses, collaboration with medical/veterinary associations and the academic community.
  • 2. A gift, that directly supports advocacy initiatives.
Thank you for your support....

Related:

Stephen M. Apatow
Founder, Director of Research & Development
Humanitarian Resource Institute
Humanitarian University Consortium Graduate Studies
Center for Medicine, Veterinary Medicine & Law
Phone: 203-668-0282
Email: s.m.apatow@humanitarian.net
Internet: www.humanitarian.net

Pathobiologics International
Internet: www.pathobiologics.org



Back to Humanitarian Resource Institute

Copyright © 1994-2010 Humanitarian Resource Institute.  All rights reserved
..